On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 01:30:36PM -0500, Brian Conway wrote: > > Reviving this thread, apologies for discontinuity in mail readers: > https://marc.info/?t=165642193500008 > > After rebasing on 7.3, my results have mirrored Hrvoje's testing at the end > of that thread. No issues with throughput, unusual latency, or reliability. > `vmstat -i` shows some level of balancing between the queues. I've been > testing on as many em(4) systems as I have access to, some manually, some in > a packet forwarder/firewall scenarios: > > em0 at pci1 dev 0 function 0 "Intel I210" rev 0x03, msix, 2 queues, address > 00:f1:f3:... > em1 at pci2 dev 0 function 0 "Intel I210" rev 0x03, msix, 2 queues, address > 00:f1:f3:... > em2 at pci3 dev 0 function 0 "Intel I210" rev 0x03, msix, 2 queues, address > 00:f1:f3:... > em3 at pci4 dev 0 function 0 "Intel I210" rev 0x03, msix, 2 queues, address > 00:f1:f3:... > em4 at pci5 dev 0 function 0 "Intel I210" rev 0x03, msix, 2 queues, address > 00:f1:f3:... > em5 at pci6 dev 0 function 0 "Intel I210" rev 0x03, msix, 2 queues, address > 00:f1:f3:... > > em0 at pci1 dev 0 function 0 "Intel I210" rev 0x03, msix, 4 queues, address > 00:0d:b9:... > em1 at pci2 dev 0 function 0 "Intel I210" rev 0x03, msix, 4 queues, address > 00:0d:b9:... > em2 at pci3 dev 0 function 0 "Intel I210" rev 0x03, msix, 4 queues, address > 00:0d:b9:... > > em0 at pci1 dev 0 function 0 "Intel I211" rev 0x03, msix, 2 queues, address > 00:0d:b9:... > em1 at pci2 dev 0 function 0 "Intel I211" rev 0x03, msix, 2 queues, address > 00:0d:b9:... > em2 at pci3 dev 0 function 0 "Intel I211" rev 0x03, msix, 2 queues, address > 00:0d:b9:...
Last time I tested (about a year go) on I211, rx locked up if I tried something like iperf3 or tcpbench. Don't know if you have a similar problem. > em0 at pci1 dev 0 function 0 "Intel 82574L" rev 0x00: msi, address > 68:05:ca:... > > The only questions I have are around queue identification. All the specs I've > been able to find indicate the I210 should have 4 queues, did Intel make a > cheaper version with 2 toward the end of production? Or could it be an I211 > masquerading as an I210 (and would that be bad for the driver)? > > Also, > https://www.mouser.com/pdfdocs/Intel_82574L_82574IT_GbE_Controller_brief.pdf > indicates that the 82574L should have 2 queues? > > Anyway, great work, please let me know if there's more I can do to help this > move forward. > > Brian Conway > Lead Software Engineer, Owner > RCE Software, LLC >
