On 2023/05/18 11:28:58 -0600, Todd C. Miller <mill...@openbsd.org> wrote: > On Thu, 18 May 2023 18:13:57 +0200, Omar Polo wrote: > > > + if (ret != 0) > > > + warnx("[Warning] unable to run `%s'", buf); > > > > more than "unable to run" I'd say "failed to run" or "command > > failed" / "exited with nonzero status". > > How about "failed with status N"? It can be useful to have the > exit status since that may indicate the source of the errorĀ (though > perhaps not so much in this case).
I couldn't have come up with something better. > Updated diff follows. ok for me. Thanks!