On 23.5.2023. 21:13, Klemens Nanni wrote: > On Sat, Jan 14, 2023 at 02:28:27PM +0000, Stuart Henderson wrote: >> On 2023/01/12 04:49, Mikolaj Kucharski wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Is there anything else which I can do, to help this diff reviwed and >>> increase the chance of getting in? >>> >>> Thread at https://marc.info/?t=163478298600001&r=1&w=2 >>> >>> Last version of the diff at >>> https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=167185582521873&q=mbox >> Inlining that for a few comments, otherwise it's ok sthen > wgdescr[iption] would be consistent with the existing descr[iption]. > At least my keep typing the trailing "r"... > > Then '-wgdescr' and 'wgdescr ""' work and are implemented exactly like > te inteface description equivalents. > > I could use this now in a new VPN setup, so here's a polished diff, > with the above, missing ifconfig.8 bits written and other nits inline. > > As Theo suggested, I'd drop the wg.4 and leave it to ifconfig.8 proper. > > Feedback? > > Either way, net/wireguard-tools needs a bump/rebuild. >
Hi, this would be nice features when having wg server with lots of wgpeers. I've tried this diff ans it's working as expected. Thank you Mikolaj and kn@
