On 31/05, Omar Polo wrote:
Agreed. I prefer the second patch too, which I'm reattaching since it was mangled (whitespaces; 'patch -l' is not enough, but 'got patch' managed to apply it.)
My bad, I am still not very comfortable with mailing patches, but I will learn.
Will wait a bit still in case someone disagrees, but I don't really see the point in having hack scraping $PATH for finding itself; the format wasn't changed since the initial import so I guess we'll be fine :-)
Thank you!