On Mon, 12 Jun 2023 18:48:56 +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > Neither of these are really ideal, and mean that we still need gseq > for integers >= 1,000,000 > > $ seq 999999 999999 > 999999 > $ seq 1000000 1000000 > 1e+06 > > $ gseq 1050000 1050000 > 1050000
That probably requires a separate code path specifically for integers. One thing at a time. - todd
