On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 11:40:55AM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 12:25:19PM +0200, thib4711 wrote:
> > The line comment in struct vnode is fine;
> >
> > diff --git sys/sys/vnode.h sys/sys/vnode.h
> > index 30787afddd8..b2f0fa4b60c 100644
> > --- sys/sys/vnode.h
> > +++ sys/sys/vnode.h
> > @@ -74,12 +74,7 @@ enum vtagtype {
> > "unused", "unused", "unused", "ISOFS", "unused", \
> > "EXT2FS", "VFS", "NTFS", "UDF", "FUSEFS", "TMPFS"
> >
> > -/*
> > - * Each underlying filesystem allocates its own private area and hangs
> > - * it from v_data. If non-null, this area is freed in getnewvnode().
> > - */
> > LIST_HEAD(buflists, buf);
> > -
> > RBT_HEAD(buf_rb_bufs, buf);
> >
> > struct namecache;
> >
>
> Yes, this comment is not helpful (especially since v_data is cleaned up by
> the reclaim function).
>
> OK claudio@
it is fine with me too. ok semarie@
--
Sebastien Marie
