Hi, The patch below marks up "NO_ARCH" consistently with the other variables. I noticed because on man.openbsd.org, NO_ARCH looks off compared to the others: https://man.openbsd.org/bsd.port.mk.5#MULTI_PACKAGES
Comments or OKs? Caspar Index: bsd.port.mk.5 =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/src/share/man/man5/bsd.port.mk.5,v retrieving revision 1.604 diff -u -p -r1.604 bsd.port.mk.5 --- bsd.port.mk.5 5 Sep 2023 23:45:53 -0000 1.604 +++ bsd.port.mk.5 6 Sep 2023 11:44:22 -0000 @@ -2447,7 +2447,7 @@ below. Especially read the part about .Ev ONLY_FOR_ARCHS when some of the packages only exist for some architectures. -.It NO_ARCH +.It Ev NO_ARCH Location for arch-independent packages. Defaults to .Sq no-arch .
