On Sun, 15 Oct 2023 13:53:46 -0500, Scott Cheloha wrote: > Align timeout(1)'s execvp(3) failure statuses with those of GNU > timeout. 127 for ENOENT, 126 for everything else.
Looks correct to me. OK millert@ - todd
On Sun, 15 Oct 2023 13:53:46 -0500, Scott Cheloha wrote: > Align timeout(1)'s execvp(3) failure statuses with those of GNU > timeout. 127 for ENOENT, 126 for everything else.
Looks correct to me. OK millert@ - todd