On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 07:02:58AM -0800, Allison Randal wrote: > This is one of the topics we discussed at UDS, with the conclusion that > while we may not be quite as strict as Debian, we will follow most of > their guidelines, as a well-tested procedure for ensuring that the > software is legally distributable.
Ah, thank you. Do you have a reference to a gobby document or something like that? > We're setting up a "Security Checklist" wiki page now, and may need a > similar "Legal Checklist", so it's completely transparent what we're > accepting and rejecting. (We might be able to refer to the > PackagingGuide's Copyright content instead, will re-review with an eye > to how straightforward it is to apply it to our process.) Normally I'm a fan of incorporating things by reference, but I think it would be a little confusing in this case - you'd have to say "this document, except for X, Y, and Z". -- Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com] -- technical-board mailing list technical-board@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/technical-board
