On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 03:52:45PM +0100, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 08:20:30AM -0700, Scott James Remnant wrote: > > On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 2:33 AM, Evan Dandrea <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > To be clear, since it wasn't addressed in my original email, I intend > > > to only present percentages of successful and unsuccessful installs. > > 3) Collaboration. > > > > This, to my mind, is the most important. > > This is a good reason to share raw data. It's useful for people to be able > to run their own analyses. > > That said, the question of whether we share the raw data isn't a > deciding factor for me. I think we should do this measurement because it's > useful in itself.
Can you describe how it is useful? I still don't see why the numbers would actually tell us anything actionable. Having a raw count of number of installs might be interesting, but I'm not sure I see the step to "useful". -Kees -- Kees Cook Ubuntu Security Team -- technical-board mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/technical-board
