Sect 3.15 - Do we want to add a potential requirement that the published checks if errata have been fixed when a new RFC obsoletes and older one (with errata)?
Bert > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Behalf Of Stephen Hayes (TX/EUS) > Sent: Friday, January 13, 2006 22:03 > To: [email protected] > Subject: [Techspec] New version of mankin-pub-req available > > > The -02 version of the technical publication requirements is > available at > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-mankin-pub-req-02.tx t. It is an extensive rewrite of the -01 version with an eye to taking a more systematic approach. The new version is basically a laundry list of requirements (both current and potential) against a technical publisher. The goal is to provide a framework in which we can decide what the IETF wants a technical publisher to do and what level of performance we want to see. Comments eagerly awaited. Stephen Hayes _______________________________________________ Techspec mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/techspec _______________________________________________ Techspec mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/techspec
