--On onsdag, februar 15, 2006 16:26:48 -0600 Spencer Dawkins
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
From: "Harald Tveit Alvestrand" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I'd state flatly that the techspec requirements apply to documents from
the IETF that are published with IETF approval, as decided by the IESG.
If, as I think, we want the publication mechanism to be applicable to
other documents (which includes independent submissions, IAB documents,
IRTF documents and IAOC documents, if any), I think the requirements for
those classes of documents need to be separate.
Trying to merge them makes the process of writing them down FAR too
convoluted.
Harald
Hi, Harald,
On this same topic - aren't direct submissions, IETF documents, IAB
documents, IRTF documents, and IAOC documents are all submitted and
approved for publication in different ways?
If so, it seems unhelpful to put procedures for all of these documents
into a single draft - wouldn't that mean that the draft would be approved
by all the different approving bodies before it could be published?
I think I'm agreeing and just trying to make sure I understand all the
reasons why you're right :-)
that makes eminent sense to me, so I guess we understand each other :-)
otoh, in the end the continuation (or not) of the RFC series has to be
reduced in the end to a single statement of work under a single contract -
but I think the IETF standard process should make *its* input into that
process now, and let the other pieces come along later.
Harald
_______________________________________________
Techspec mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/techspec
