> > for excessive changes at that stage, which *does* happen, > > the publisher needs to be able to say no.
> ... and get lost here. I'm fine with the AD saying "that change is > excessive for AUTH48" to authors, but having the technical publisher > tell the AD(s, or the IESG), "that change is excessive for AUTH48" > seems like a stretch. excessive: you know it when you see it. Like when an l2tp document asked for 278 editorial changes during AUTH48. (No, I'm not making this up!) Thomas _______________________________________________ Techspec mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/techspec
