I too want to thank Elwyn for the detailed somments. > > Potential Req-POSTCORR-3 - The IETF technical publisher should > > > > have the discretion to reject post-approval corrections as too > > > > late in the process and propose that it be handled as errata.
> This is an open issue I will raise at the techspec BOF. I see as the not the IETF technical publisher's discretion. I would see this as the IETF's policy determination and an Area Director determining. The technical publisher could propose errata but the document shepherd and the final greenlighter of the document (currently the AD) should be the ones who exercise the technical discretion. They should strongly respect the technical publisher's motivation in pushing back post-approval corrections, but not give up their technical accountability. My view. Allison _______________________________________________ Techspec mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/techspec
