See inline > -----Original Message----- > From: Paul Hoffman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 1:37 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [Techspec] Validation of formal languages > > > Section 3.5 that seems out of place in that it is the only part of > this document that says "the IETF technical publisher will review > this part of documents for technical correctness". It makes sense to > say "if automated tools are available to check formal languages, the > IETF technical publisher should run the tools late in the editing > process", but not to make it seem like that validation is the job of > the technical publisher.
I agree. It was intended to refer to validation using tools. > > This section might also add a requirement that the IETF technical > publisher should not change any examples (changing words, > reformatting with line breaks, and so on) without explicitly alerting > the document authors. Some formal languages are quite sensitive to > byte counts and line breaks. In general, I think the publisher should work with the authors for any changes required to formal language sections. > > --Paul Hoffman, Director > --VPN Consortium > > _______________________________________________ > Techspec mailing list > [email protected] > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/techspec > _______________________________________________ Techspec mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/techspec
