Paul Hoffman wrote > o Req-PREEDIT-1: The IETF technical publisher should perform an > editorial review of documents before WG last call and provide > feedback to the authors to improve quality of the > documents. This > review should strive to maintain consistency in appearance with > previously published documents. > The phrase "should perform" is quite different than "should support". > It seems that the consensus was that this should be done, so "should > perform" is correct.
I agree, the current wording is too strong. Even if IETF decides to go down the pre-approval review route, it is not clear what documents you would use it on. It is certainly a stretch to assume all WG docs would be pre-approved. It is also unclear that it is only WG docs that could have pre-approval review. I will change the wording to indicate that is it something the technical publisher should do when requested by appropriate technical representatives. > > --Paul Hoffman, Director > --VPN Consortium > _______________________________________________ Techspec mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/techspec
