I'm glad to tell you that the remaining IESG DISCUSS ballots have been cleared,
this document is good to go. Thanks everybody, this has been a very
productive discussion.
Brian
Stephen Hayes (PL/EUS) wrote:
FYI,
New version of mankin-pub-req now available. This addresses the remaining
discuss comments and the additional requirement mentioned previously by Allison.
Stephen
Change Log:
mankin-pub-req-10 -> mankin-pub-req-11
1. Section 3.1 (pre-approval editing) was updated to make it clearer that
early copy editing is not currently part of the IETF standards process and the
IETF must still make a decision as to whether it will become part of the
process.
2. Sections 2.1, 3.3, and 3.7 cleaned up the wording to remove the
ambiguity about who the document shepherd was and who had the authority to
approve changes.
3. As Allison indicated in a previous mail: a new section (3.22) and
requirement was added to capture the need for a liaison from the technical
publisher to the IESG.
-----Original Message-----
From: ID Tracker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 28, 2006 2:50 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Stephen Hayes (PL/EUS); [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: New Version Notification - draft-mankin-pub-req-11.txt
New version (-11) has been submitted for draft-mankin-pub-req-11.txt.
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-mankin-pub-req-11.txt
IETF Secretariat.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Techspec mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/techspec
_______________________________________________
Techspec mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/techspec
