Nils Philippsen wrote:
>
> On Thu, 16 Dec 1999, Laurel Fan wrote:
>
> > [1] I'm sure there's still some uucp or bbs mail systems out there..
>
> Yes, here. And it makes perfect sense to use UUCP on Linux instead of POP.
> With UUCP I have "my own" mail domain and can setup any number of accounts
> if I wish.
Ditto with SMTP, actually. Which is what Laurel had indicated
as the alternative format for mail servers. (As opposed to clients)
Jenn V.
--
"We're repairing the coolant loop of a nuclear fusion reactor.
This is women's work!"
Helix, Freefall. http://www.purrsia.com/freefall/
Jenn Vesperman [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.simegen.com/~jenn
************
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linuxchix.org
- RE: [techtalk] POP mail Di Gregory
- RE: [techtalk] POP mail Samantha Jo Moore
- RE: [techtalk] POP mail Di Gregory
- Re: [techtalk] POP mail Jenn V.
- Re: [techtalk] POP mail Steve Kudlak
- RE: [techtalk] POP mail Samantha Jo Moore
- Re: [techtalk] POP mail Steve Kudlak
- Re: [techtalk] POP mail Laurel Fan
- [techtalk] UUCP, was: POP mail Nils Philippsen
- Re: [techtalk] UUCP, was: POP ... Kelly Lynn Martin
- Re: [techtalk] UUCP, was: POP ... Jenn V.
- Re: [techtalk] UUCP, was: POP ... Nils Philippsen
- Re: [techtalk] POP mail Laurel Fan
- Re: [techtalk] POP mail Laurel Fan
- Re: [techtalk] POP mail Jenn V.
- [techtalk] Corel Linux Jane Susi
- Re: [techtalk] Corel Linux Laurel Fan
- Re: [techtalk] Corel Linux Dan McGarry
- Re: [techtalk] Corel Linux GECOS
- Re: [techtalk] POP mail Laurel Fan
