Given the fact we're extremely short on time, and also that the likelihood of any of our candidates being picked is modest at best, I would be comfortable submitting Gaspar, Karin and Taran, all of whom I think would represent our interests quite well. My one concern is that we have not heard from either Gaspar or Karin, and I fear they may not come online before it is too late. Perhaps what we could do is this: I could contact the coordinator of the process, and see if it would be alright to offer their names tentatively, and explain that we are a brand new working group and only got the notice at the last minute, so we're still waiting to hear from Gaspar and Karin to confirm their interest. That way, we can throw their names into the hat rather than miss the hat entirely, but have the option to withdraw their names if they decline the nomination.

Would anyone have any objections to this? Or a better idea? Time is running very short...

ac

Don Cameron wrote:
We are probably already beaten by the short deadline however great to see a
few nominations for the Working Group for Internet Governance (as limited as
this definition may be) - Matyas Gaspar is widely known in Telecentre
circles as a person of empathy and understanding of the challenges we face
and I willingly support the nomination. Karin is unknown to me however the
great work of Chasquinet would certainly support nomination as someone
representative of the aims and objectives of the Telecentre Working Group.

Rgds, Don



-- -------------------------------------- Andy Carvin Program Director EDC Center for Media & Community acarvin @ edc . org http://www.digitaldividenetwork.org http://www.edwebproject.org/andy/blog/ -------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ telecentres mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/telecentres To unsubscribe, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word UNSUBSCRIBE in the body of the message.

Reply via email to