>> in Australia Telecentre is a medium to engage the Youth. While in Countries like India, Bangladesh, Burkina Faso  & others who are struggling with twin issue basic literacy -(read and write) and adapting to ICT tools (snip)

 

Hi Ashish, all,

 

My apologies if by example I have given the impression Australian Telecentre’s are limited to youth engagement. This is just one function of one Telecentre cited for reason of highlighting diversity. Australian Telecentre’s are as diverse as the community’s they serve – from affluent urban centres to very remote indigenous communities with all the problems associated with isolation, literacy, poverty, lack of services, and the more than 280 native languages spoken by indigenous Australians.

 

From a historical perspective the term ‘Telecentre’ is accredited to Scandinavian efforts during the 1980’s however the concept of Telecentre’s across the globe predate these efforts by many decades. The first Australian Telecentre’s (places where people would congregate to use ICT’s for community, education and tele-health purposes) were widely in use during the 1930’s and comprised of communal homesteads on large rural Stations (a Station being a large farm of several thousand square kilometres historically populated by dozens of indigenous and immigrant families).

 

The technologies deployed at Station homesteads were the type of pedal-powered radio invented by Alfred Traeger and linked by the Royal Flying Doctor Service wireless network to community’s in other Stations as well as to nurses and doctors able to offer remote tele-health services. During the 1950’s the network was expanded through the efforts of John Flynn and Adelaide Miethke to include tele-education through the formation of Australia’s School of the Air. This development resulted in the Station ‘Telecentre’ of the 1950’s offering much the same range of services as many of today’s Telecentre’s even though they were not named as such. The year 2001 was the 50th anniversary of this type of Telecentre in Australia, and for my part as a rural Australian is a legacy of our parents and grandparents. There is certainly nothing new to this concept, and the long history of communal ICT access centres probably explains why we have so many different names for the concept we now call a Telecentre.

 

Tying this to the WSIS declaration – I must disagree with your assessment that “Based on the demographics & literacy level, it will be a long time before individuals can be at a stage to use the ICT tools independently”. If by such you refer to the use of computers and the Internet then I agree – however ICT’s are not limited to computers and online interaction; a simple pedal-powered radio can offer a wealth of benefits with very little learning or literacy requirements if supported by an appropriate network. Too often I think we seek to drive change at the macro level rather than focusing on the necessary micro developments required to achieve macro change. It would be foolish to attempt to introduce a reliance on computers and the ‘net to people in poverty who cannot read, write, or who speak many different languages. Such an effort would not be supportive of a managed approach to development nor would it be an empathic approach. ICT tools can be used independently by anyone providing we provide the right ICT tools for the given stage of development. Learning will occur, and in time more advanced ICT’s will be appropriate, accepted and deployed.

 

Rgds, Don    

 

_______________________________________________
telecentres mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/telecentres
To unsubscribe, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word UNSUBSCRIBE in the 
body of the message.

Reply via email to