On Mon, 2010-11-15 at 14:30 +0000, Simon McVittie wrote: > On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 at 14:08:48 +0000, Sjoerd Simons wrote: > > Also can we use Preferred_Handler instead of Next_Handler and allow it > > to be an empty string? > > That was my plan, yes; using the same argument name would make that > clearer, though, so I'll do that.
Cool > > Last part of my small bike-shed, i wonder if it's worth for it to return > > a ChannelRequest so it's basically really just EnsureChannelWithHints > > without the request time properties. Just so all the interfaces we add > > over time to ChannelRequest can be easily applied to this > > Only if it's acceptable to require its caller to call Proceed. > I'm not sure that this really "looks like" a ChannelRequest - in the > current MC codebase it would basically be an off-bus McdDispatchOperation, in > fact. I'd be inclined to prototype it without the ChannelRequest, then look > at the resulting code and think about whether a ChannelRequest would make > sense. I guess, it's not so much for the MC implementation but more for clients and developers to just have this method follow a pattern that they're already used to.. But i could go either way really -- Sjoerd Simons <sjoerd.sim...@collabora.co.uk> Collabora Ltd. _______________________________________________ telepathy mailing list telepathy@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/telepathy