On 26/01/15 16:35, Olivier Crête wrote: > On 26/01/15 08:51 AM, Dominik George wrote: >> Technically, the servers could be split, but as all relevant TURN >> server implementations also do STUN and there is no reason to >> disable that, I think it is a very safe bet. > > All TURN servers are also STUN servers, so it's definitely very valid > to only supply a TURN server
... but not every STUN server is also a TURN server. In particular, there are lots of free community-provided STUN servers out there. telepathy-gabble defaults to (iirc) stun.telepathy.im, which is provided by Collabora; that's sufficient to get through relatively "friendly" NATs, but it does not offer TURN (if it did, it would cost us a lot more bandwidth and would be a privacy concern for Telepathy users). S _______________________________________________ telepathy mailing list telepathy@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/telepathy