On 07/12/16 16:46, Daniel Pocock wrote: > > > On 07/12/16 16:41, Gustavo Boiko wrote: >> Hi >> >> On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 1:33 PM, Daniel Pocock <dan...@pocock.pro >> <mailto:dan...@pocock.pro>> wrote: >> >> >> >> On 07/12/16 16:22, Gustavo Boiko wrote: >> > Hi Daniel >> > >> > On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 12:54 PM, Daniel Pocock <dan...@pocock.pro >> <mailto:dan...@pocock.pro> >> > <mailto:dan...@pocock.pro <mailto:dan...@pocock.pro>>> wrote: >> > >> > >> > Debian has telepathy-qt for both qt4 and qt5: >> > >> > https://packages.qa.debian.org/t/telepathy-qt.html >> <https://packages.qa.debian.org/t/telepathy-qt.html> >> > <https://packages.qa.debian.org/t/telepathy-qt.html >> <https://packages.qa.debian.org/t/telepathy-qt.html>> >> > >> > So far, we've been building and testing telepathy-resiprocate with >> > qt4 only >> > >> > I've just updated the resiprocate 1.11.0~alpha1 to Debian, which >> adds a >> > telepathy-resiprocate.deb for the first time. >> > >> > Should it be changed to build against telepathy-qt5 instead of qt4 >> for >> > the upcoming Debian release, or is there significant risk in doing >> that >> > without more time for testing? >> > >> > >> > I think moving forward it is best to use telepathy-qt5. I am playing a >> > bit with telepathy-resiprocate and have proposed the following pull >> > request which changes it to use qt5 and adapts some package detection: >> > https://github.com/resiprocate/resiprocate/pull/73 >> <https://github.com/resiprocate/resiprocate/pull/73> >> > <https://github.com/resiprocate/resiprocate/pull/73 >> <https://github.com/resiprocate/resiprocate/pull/73>> >> > >> > Please let me know if those changes make sense. >> > >> >> I've accepted the pull request, thanks for that contribution >> >> > Are the debian files with the telepathy-resiprocate packaging available >> > in a branch on github? I'd like to use that to try it out on Ubuntu. >> > >> >> The Debian packaging is in a clone of the repository on Github, but the >> branches for Debian are pushed to alioth >> >> The URLs are here, see the VCS link: >> >> https://packages.qa.debian.org/r/resiprocate.html >> <https://packages.qa.debian.org/r/resiprocate.html> >> >> I just made some fresh commits in the last few days >> >> You should be able to do something like this to build: >> >> git clone git://anonscm.debian.org/pkg-voip/resiprocate.git >> <http://anonscm.debian.org/pkg-voip/resiprocate.git> >> git checkout debian/sid >> dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -i.* -j13 >> >> If you want to make changes, you could create a branch off >> debian/sid, e.g. >> >> git branch debian/boiko-tp-qt debian/sid >> >> You may have to manually install some build dependencies with apt-get, >> but you can get most of them with >> >> apt-get build-dep resiprocate >> >> >> Ah ok, I was already changing the debian/ directory I forked from master >> to add a telepathy-resiprocate package there. I will get the debian one >> instead. > > The debian/sid branch already has a telepathy-resiprocate package > > It is currently stuck in the NEW queue because each time a new package > name is added to debian/control, it needs to be approved by the FTP > masters again > > https://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html > > Notice I also raised a bug against the gnome desktop package: > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=838040 > > and if you have time to look into that issue or discuss it with the > GNOME maintainers it would also help a lot. Currently people can't just > do "dpkg --purge telepathy-rakia" because of that dependency issue. >
I just pushed another small fix on the debian/sid branch, you may want to pull that if you already started playing with it Regards, Daniel _______________________________________________ telepathy mailing list telepathy@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/telepathy