I think Steve is running at least partly in 3.5 Ghz (?) I may be wrong. I know the company that the original Holly Grail email was showing - they pretty much encompass me and their reputation for being stupidly, ridiculously, atrociously over subbed, and installing ANYONE regardless of the signal, is the best thing that ever happened to my company... so you're not going to serve 186 UE's at 10 to 25Mbps each like the Power Point slides show... the math isn't there.
And I never bought into this being the holly grail of NLOS either. Physics is physics. We have either clear LOS or VERY near LOS on 3.65 and it works. But My (latest) problem is with UE's that drop and reconnect for seemingly no reason. UE's with 'perfect' numbers just disconnect for no reason that I can find... while others with 'acceptable' numbers stay connected on the same sector and bearing then vice versa. My 3.65 noise floor is non existent in a VERY rural area. I am the only 3.65 user registered in a 30 mile radius and a spectrum scan using a UBNT 3.65 CPE shows no noise across the band. Sectors were at 4 and moved them to 5 degrees down and I'm going to move them to 6 but that isn't helping that I can tell. No, I haven't contacted Telrad about this yet. I didn't find any change in performance with 4x4 vs 4x2 vs 2x2 either. Ian On 04/08/2016 8:46 AM, Skywerx Support wrote: > I have enb's with over 80 clients offering mixed packages of 3, 5, 10, 15, > and 20 Mbps services. No complaints here. You obviously have something > messed up. I know of a lot companies that are using Telrad LTE and you seem > to be the only one having in depth issues. How dirty is the 3.65 band near > you? We have found that in order to get optimal performance and channel > reuse exact sector down tilt is key in achieving this. We are reusing 20 MHz > channels all over our coverage areas with making sure that other towers are > not over lapping. What kind of capacity do you have to your ENB's? Latency > from towers with ENB's to EPC? These are all huge factors in making this > stuff kick ass! > > -- > Justin Davis > COO > SkyWerx Industries, LLC > > On Aug 4, 2016, at 6:31 AM, Steve Cole <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> Which EPC are you using? The 2020? Do you have the latest software >> on it? >> >> Yes and yes. All the software is new. >> >> Telrad has simply not delivered on their promises. Maybe they will, but >> I lost faith a while ago and preparing a way out if I have to take it. >> And as I mentioned before, they are trying to get us into a $5/customer >> (roughly) service contract to deal with the issues. So much for being >> one of the first customers to take up their gear and being one of the >> only ones converting 50+ people per base station - and so much for the >> talk of them doing 100+ people per base station, too. Right now I >> would recommend this gear and the company behind it only to my enemies. >> >> We'll see what happens, I find that refusing to pay them for things is >> the only thing that gets their attention. >> _______________________________________________ >> Telrad mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/telrad > _______________________________________________ > Telrad mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/telrad _______________________________________________ Telrad mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/telrad
