On Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 09:57:47AM -0400, darren chamberlain wrote:
> inetd is only necessary for pserver access.  

[ssh details snipped]

> pserver is only necessary
> for anonymous access, and it doesn't sound like that's your goal.

That's one of the goals.  Anonymous access for regular punters, ssh access 
for me (who has a shell account) and other trusted developers (who don't).

I've got pserver running in a chrooted shell and it seems to be OK.

> As an aside, why does inetd care what the address is?  

I don't know.  Our box has numerous IP addresses and domain names.  
If I do:

   cvs -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/template-toolkit login

then it works fine, but if I try:

   cvs -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/template-toolkit login

then I get dropped out of the bottom of the /etc/hosts.allow file with
the message "You are not welcome to blah blah blah":
    
    # The rest of the daemons are protected.
    ALL : ALL \
        : severity auth.info \
        : twist /bin/echo "You are not welcome to use %d from %h."

The docs seemed to suggest that adding the following line to /etc/hosts.allow
should do the trick:

    [EMAIL PROTECTED] : ALL : allow

but it doesn't :-(


A




Reply via email to