Andy Wardley sent the following bits through the ether: > Please test it when you get a chance. Unless there are any problems, > or other objections, I'll consider this a candidate for 2.08 and release > it as such some time next week.
It looks good to me... about 90% of the time. There's a timing problem in t/date.t: ... MATCH FAILED input: [[% USE date(time => time) %]\ndefault: [% date.format %]\n] expect: [default: 19:01:37 07-Jul-2002] output: [default: 19:01:38 07-Jul-2002] FAILED 7: - did not match expected not ok 7 - did not match expected ... (and so on) - so particular tests overlap the seconds changing. It's probably best to force a specific date to be use in the date tests, but I'm afraid I don't have time atm to hack up a patch. Looks great otherwise, Leon -- Leon Brocard.............................http://www.astray.com/ Nanoware...............................http://www.nanoware.org/ ... Caution: Contents under pressure
