>
>
> On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 06:23:35PM -0400, Parker, Brian wrote:
> > That makes sense. I bet you're right. I wonder if 'sort' could be a
> > no-op method for a scalar to handle this case.
>
> That would probably be a good idea.
>
OK, I vote for the following patch. Looks like someone had the same idea for the
'item' method. Sorry, I don't have a way to test a change to the .xs file.
$ diff -Naur orig_Stash.pm Stash.pm
--- orig_Stash.pm 2002-07-02 19:07:06.000000000 -0500
+++ Stash.pm 2002-07-02 19:07:20.000000000 -0500
@@ -51,6 +51,7 @@
};
$SCALAR_OPS = {
+ 'sort' => sub { $_[0] },
'item' => sub { $_[0] },
'list' => sub { [ $_[0] ] },
'hash' => sub { { value => $_[0] } },
regards,
Brian
