--- Marcin Kasperski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Using those techniques the templates can be kept and viewed as valid > HTML. Of course there is price - complicated rules are hard. But for > the simple replacements like common header and footer this idea is > sound.
Yuck. I would much rather render the HTML page and validate that instead. Again, why are you seperating the concept of header and footer? WRAPPER makes it possible to combine these two entities into one easier to manage entity. And unless you are using a head or footer sepatately from the other ... i see no reason to have your WRAPPER use INCLUDE to pull in the header and footer. The idea is to keep one enitity that is easier to validate than two serarate pieces. And changing TT's internal syntax is absolutely out of the question right now. ;) jeffa __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - More reliable, more storage, less spam http://mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ templates mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.template-toolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/templates
