On Fri, 2005-01-07 at 10:39 +0000, Harry Jackson wrote: > Would you then alias INCLUDE to PROCESS?
Yes. > You know a lot more about the work involved than me but for backwards > compatibility but would it not be easier to make INCLUDE_FAST an alias > to PROCESS. I think people do not read the whole doc (they would not be missing the localisation in INCLUDE if they did) but rather go looking for something called "include" and stop when they find it. So, no, I don't think that's a good enough solution. Basically, I believe the most obvious thing should be the thing that is correct for the most people, and I think that most people don't want localisation when they INCLUDE if it comes with any performance penalty. - Perrin _______________________________________________ templates mailing list [email protected] http://lists.template-toolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/templates
