Keith Barrette wrote: > Just wondering if anyone had comments on the patch I mailed 7/15 - the > complete lack of replies makes me think that perhaps no one else has > noticed the problem?
Hi Keith, Sorry, I missed that one. Just read it now. The problem that I see with it is that it means you would no longer be able to catch a method that returned undef as an error. That would make object methods different from subroutines and accessing hash entries. I'm not sure they should be different. I think to do the job properly, the whole stash should differentiate between "found", "not found", "found but undefined", and "error". But I think major changes like that should wait until TT3 (which is getting closer). Cheers A _______________________________________________ templates mailing list templates@template-toolkit.org http://mail.template-toolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/templates
