PPA would be could to be able to get more people to test the new versions without going through bzr pull and install. I guess by now, Ubuntu users are used to PPA.
For the rest of the community, either we could get a sponsor to create packages for mainstream distros. Then, for the developer community, people will still rely on source. Manu On Thu, 2010-02-04 at 08:42 +0000, Chris Jones wrote: > Hey folks > > I realised that the terminator-users mailing list had never had any > posts, so I thought I'd kick things off by asking for your opinions! > > Over the last 6 months I've been working on a completely new core for > Terminator - literally every single line of the code has been rewritten > or refactored. The result is a much, much more flexible and robust > architecture to carry us forward to a 1.0 release. > > However, such an invasive change is bound to have created a large number > of regressions and new bugs. I've already found and fixed a lot of these > myself or with informal help from the folks on #terminator, but I'd like > to cast the net a little wider, and since you good people have indicated > that you use Terminator, I'd be interested to get your help! > > The question is how to go about it - are you comfortable checking out > bzr branches, or would you prefer a full alpha/beta release with > tarballs, or are enough of you Ubuntu users that a separate PPA with > testing releases would be best? > > Discuss :) > > Cheers, !DSPAM:4b6af1d761676960285278!
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~terminator-users Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~terminator-users More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
