On Friday, May 10, 2013 7:45:13 AM UTC-4, Renard Wellnitz wrote: > > Regarding publishing the code. I want to do this. Iam not yet sure if i > want to use the GPL or Apache 2.0. > Also since i modified tesseract and leptonica sources a bit and have > several submodules i need to write a proper build script or readme file > before releasing the sources. > If i have time i'll push something to my git hub this weekend. >
That would be great. If you put it up on Github, people could be encouraged to help you with the cleanup and submit pull requests. Personally I'd prefer a non-viral license like Apache or a limited viral license like EPL/LGPL, but the choice is yours, obviously. On Friday, May 10, 2013 10:16:36 AM UTC-4, Nick White wrote: > > > I'm very happy to hear you're planning on releasing the code under GPL > or Apache. Either would be fab (though I'd probably favour GPL > personally, so nasty people would be less inclined to just take your > code and add advertising, but maybe this isn't much of a problem with > Android, I don't know). GPL won't prevent people from creating an ad-supported version. They just have to publish their changes. Tom -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tesseract-ocr" group. To post to this group, send email to tesseract-ocr@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to tesseract-ocr+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tesseract-ocr?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tesseract-ocr" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tesseract-ocr+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.