Joe Orton wrote:
[...]
I think it's OK, but since you had a mixed revision working copy it looks a little strange: you had:

  . => last "svn update" at r111612
  Makefile.PL, RELEASE => committed changes in r111613
  Changes => committed changes in r111614

and so when you copied the WC to the tag, that's exactly what SVN
copied.  If you had run "svn update" first, it would all have been
copied from the same revision, r111614 (or whatever).

I understand that, but I assumed that if I checkin a file it would also update my current WC.

But the normal procedure for tagging is to copy from URL to URL, which
avoids this and is faster:

svn copy https://svn.apache.org/.../trunk \ https://svn.apache.org/.../tags/1.17

(optionally with an -r to peg at specific revision, I guess)

Yes, that's probably what we will have to end up doing in the future.

Thanks!

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Philippe M. Chiasson m/gozer\@(apache|cpan|ectoplasm)\.org/ GPG KeyID : 88C3A5A5 http://gozer.ectoplasm.org/ F9BF E0C2 480E 7680 1AE5 3631 CB32 A107 88C3A5A5

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature



Reply via email to