On Fri, 21 Dec 2001, Stas Bekman wrote: > OK, here it is: I've finally called it skip_all() as it's a standalone > function now.
cool, +1. but would rather it still be called skip_unless()
On Fri, 21 Dec 2001, Stas Bekman wrote: > OK, here it is: I've finally called it skip_all() as it's a standalone > function now.
cool, +1. but would rather it still be called skip_unless()