On Mon, 24 Dec 2001, Stas Bekman wrote: > I've almost committed the stuff, but then I've tried to apply it to > httpd-test/perl-framework's t/TEST and couldn't do it because t/TEST had: > > %Apache::TestConfig::Argv = qw(apxs /home/stas/httpd/prefork/bin/apxs); > > which is not generic (and the same goes for t/SMOKE, but it doesn't need > it),
not generic, meaning? it is generic for any t/TEST script. currently generated by Apache::TestMM::generate_script. > Apache-Test/t/ has a very non-generic t/TEST that's fine. > I suppose that t/REPORT and t/SMOKE are the only ones that are simple > and can be re-used. I really doubt whether we have any added value in > abstracting t/TEST. > > How about if I do this abstraction for SMOKE and REPORT but leave > TEST.PL as is? i don't see any reason not to generate TEST too, this is all optional stuff. if something wants to generate their own TEST script, then they don't call this new method.
