Tatsuhiko Miyagawa wrote:
At Sat, 09 Mar 2002 13:16:28 +0800,
Stas Bekman wrote:


Well, (at least now) as for my web application testing, I don't
like to use Apache::Test(Util|Request)? Because:

1) I love to do testing with Test::More's utility functions. I'd
just get accustomed to it.

Apache::Test's motto is to be self-contained and Test::More is not a part of the perl core. Therefore if you need any of Test::More functionalities we can add these to Apache::TestUtil. Either tell us what you want ported or send a patch :)


That's the exact point where we don't agree with each other, IMO. I like to make combination of "Simple" modules, and don't like "All in One" package. (Well, Test::More is going into core from perl-5.7, and even before 5.6 it's very easy to install)

So nothing prevents you from using Test::More, isn't it? Consider the only wrapper that we have -- Apache::TestUtil::t_cmp as Test::Simple :)


In addition, tests we write are not only limited in httpd one. For
example, we should write unit tests for business logic classes with
Test::More. Writing tests with various tools will go into just a
little confusion. We want consistency in them, for the cost of
learning, etc.

sure, I'm not against it. You are talking about using extra modules with Apache::Test, to write tests in 3rd party modules. You aren't talking about mod_perl core tests using Test::More, right?



_____________________________________________________________________ Stas Bekman JAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide http://perl.apache.org/guide mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://ticketmaster.com http://apacheweek.com http://singlesheaven.com http://perl.apache.org http://perlmonth.com/



Reply via email to