On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 02:02:32PM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 01:59:15PM -0700, Aaron Bannert wrote: > > So we need to fix that, right? An unmatched regexp shouldn't be fatal. > > The thought was that if the regexp failed, some expectation of how > the site was designed has changed. So, rather than continuing on, > abort. The only way to correct the problem would be to alter the > profile to correct the regexp.
Sure, but this isn't informative: flood: flood_round_robin.c:867: round_robin_postprocess: Assertion `status == 0' failed. Besides, if the user disables debugging, the assertions will be disabled. If this is a fatal error (and I'm still on the fence here) then we should detect that case and print a nice message. -aaron
