On Thu, 11 Sep 2003 21:50:44 -0700 Aaron Bannert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tuesday, September 9, 2003, at 04:18 PM, Jacek Prucia wrote: > > I would like to ask other RM's to take a closer look at RC1 tarballs. > > I might > > goofed something up and have absolutelly no idea about it :) > > The tarball builds and runs great on Darwin 6.6 (Mac OS X 10.2.6), good > work! > > Here's my +1 Cool :) > (I'm fine with distributing the apr and apr-util source until apr 1.0 > gets > released, but after that we should just say which officially released > version > of APR we depend on.) That was exactly the point. Some people just don't feel comfortable, when they have to retrieve additional stuff for official release using CVS. This just doesn't seem right. When apr/apr-util are released (soon from what I have heard), we can create small INSTALL file and describe flood system requirements there. regards, -- Jacek Prucia
