I guess we are inconsistent in logging doc changes in Changes.
personally, I think the Changes file is most useful if it logs only functionality changes. but there are other documentation issues mentioned there currently, so if you'd like I'll insert that into Changes in (around) the appropriate place chronologically.
Oh. Up to you guys; I thought stuff like that was always noted.
I forgot to add that I certainly don't mean to belittle your contributions here - you've done lots of work on the docs and added lots of value. I even mentioned you by name at my OSCon talk :)
I'll give it some thought, look over Changes more closely, and then probably add it in :)
--Geoff
