> Are you sure that there will be no side effects? I'm pretty sure. it's not like test_clean won't be called under normal 'make test' circumstances, it's just that now there would be a way around it if the user thinks it is beneficial.
> If yes, then +1 ok, cool. if things blow up then I'll revert it, but I'm not seeing any problems on my end. > > Why not just run t/TEST directly instead of using make? I never use make > when developing tests. So it was never an issue for me. t/TEST works fine for smallish things, but make is nice for automatically computing and including library directories spread out all over the place. --Geoff
