Issac Goldstand wrote:
Following up on the FAIL report for win32:
Can you post your "configuration" steps -- I'm the wrong person to ask,
but someone else might know. I see Steve H. got passing results.
Which CGI tests fail ?
The new Apache-Test-1.29-RC2 runs the test suite for 2.08 just fine
(against mod_perl-2.0.3-RC2). However, here the test suite can't load
mod_perl (also mod_perl-2.0.3-RC2) into the server properly:
The dection of mod_perl has changed 0 between 1.27->1.29 much less
1.29-rc1 and 1.29-rc2
CGI passes most tests (it fails 7; libapreq-2.08 also fails the same
ones lately. That's a separate issue for a separate thread, though),
it's just the mod_perl ones that seem to fail.
Didn't you just contradict yourself ? I'm probably reading that wrong
Deeper probing (t/conf/httpd.conf) shows that:
<IfModule !mod_perl.c>
#unable to locate mod_perl.so (could be a static build)
</IfModule>
Yes that would be the problem. (does Apache-Test have the correct path
to apxs and is it actually functional?)
Giving a path via t/TEST -libmodperl didn't help
Unfortunately, httpd-apreq unlike mod_perl does not yet handle this flag.
Fixing the path to mod_perl manually in t/conf/httpd.conf did fix it
(and all tests but the same 7 from CGI passed).
D'oh!
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Philip M. Gollucci ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) 323.219.4708
Consultant / http://p6m7g8.net/Resume/resume.shtml
Senior Software Engineer - TicketMaster - http://ticketmaster.com
1024D/A79997FA F357 0FDD 2301 6296 690F 6A47 D55A 7172 A799 97F
I never had a dream come true
'Til the day that I found you.
Even though I pretend that I've moved on
You'll always be my baby.
I never found the words to say
You're the one I think about each day
And I know no matter where life takes me to
A part of me will always be...
A part of me will always be with you.
