Adam, All of these look good to me On Aug 28, 2012 3:52 PM, "Adam Williamson" <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 2012-08-21 18:10, Adam Williamson wrote: > >> Hey, folks. As discussed a couple of weeks back, I've always believed >> the boot.iso, DVD and live boot method test cases ought to test bare >> metal booting of actual physical optical media: we have no other test >> cases specifically for this, and we do have other test cases >> specifically for USB media and virtual machines (now). So it doesn't >> seem to make sense to consider a VM or USB test as a 'pass' for these >> test cases; potentially that could mean we ship a release without ever >> actually checking that it can be written to and booted from a real >> optical disc. >> >> So, I've drafted up tweaked versions of three test cases which make >> this much clearer (and, in passing, remove obsolete references to >> anaconda's 'loader' stage, which no longer exists): >> >> >> https://fedoraproject.org/**wiki/User:Adamwill/Draft_QA_** >> Testcase_Boot_Methods_Boot_Iso<https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Adamwill/Draft_QA_Testcase_Boot_Methods_Boot_Iso> >> >> https://fedoraproject.org/**wiki/User:Adamwill/Draft_QA_** >> Testcase_Boot_Methods_Dvd<https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Adamwill/Draft_QA_Testcase_Boot_Methods_Dvd> >> >> https://fedoraproject.org/**wiki/User:Adamwill/Draft_QA_** >> Testcase_Boot_Methods_Live<https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Adamwill/Draft_QA_Testcase_Boot_Methods_Live> >> >> The first two are slightly modified versions of: >> >> https://fedoraproject.org/**wiki/QA:Testcase_Boot_Methods_**Boot_Iso<https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Boot_Methods_Boot_Iso> >> https://fedoraproject.org/**wiki/QA:Testcase_Boot_Methods_**Dvd<https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Boot_Methods_Dvd> >> >> The third is intended to replace: >> >> https://fedoraproject.org/**wiki/QA:Testcase_Live_Image_**Boot<https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Live_Image_Boot> >> >> Which is really very similar to the first two, but - presumably just >> because it happened to get written at a different time by a different >> person, or something - was worded quite differently and not named in >> the same way. It's newer than the other two, but really I kinda prefer >> the wording of the earlier ones. It seems to make sense to replace it >> with a test case based on the same wording and naming scheme as the >> other two. >> >> Comments, improvements, suggestions, complaints? Lay 'em on! Thanks. >> > > I haven't received any feedback on this yet. If no-one complains, I'll go > ahead and put them in place in the next few days. So, speak now or forever > hold your peace :) > -- > Adam Williamson > Fedora QA Community Monkey > IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora > http://www.happyassassin.net > -- > test mailing list > [email protected] > To unsubscribe: > https://admin.fedoraproject.**org/mailman/listinfo/test<https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test>
-- test mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
