That's not absurd ... that's reality.
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 12:36 AM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" <johan...@gmail.com > wrote: > On 11/06/2012 11:23 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: > >> On Nov 6, 2012, at 11:43 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" <johan...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> You do realize by having this criteria you are tying the release to >>> users having existing windows installs be it oem installs or not and that's >>> just absurd… >>> >> Why is OEM vs retail install relevant? It's NTFS in any case. You have >> some justified concern as to whether the NTFS volume is healthy prior to >> being resized in advance of Fedora's installation - I haven't tried this so >> I don't know what happens but it's seems highly risky to resize a file >> system that hasn't had a recent file system check that goes beyond checking >> the journal. >> > > Sorry not following to me it does not matter if it's whole Microsoft > Windows or just Microsoft's propriety file system it's still absurd to me > having our QA community members having to set it up and use it and have our > release be dependent upon it... > > JBG > > -- > test mailing list > test@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe: > https://admin.fedoraproject.**org/mailman/listinfo/test<https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test> >
-- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
