On 02/02/2013 02:42 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi

> Additionally, there is some history to Bugzappers as a separate project

    which was before my time, but as Johann has explained it to me, it was
    something of a 'I'm taking my ball and going home!' thing that led
    to it
    being set up as a separate sub-project outside of QA


Yes due to RH QE

.IIRC Bugzappers as a group existed years before "QA" as a project existed but that isn't really important now.


Say what? lol

Oh oh please elaborate I'm eager to hear this no really entertain me Rahul I'm eager to hear this. oh oh here's an idea let's get John Poelstra and Jon Stanley to comment on this in the legendary 3rd try to review bugzappers ( which they actually achive and for the longest time )

    Put those together, and it seems sensible to at the minimum drop the
    Bugzappers onboarding process. We can probably look at moving the
    useful
    content from the Bugzappers wiki space back into the QA space at some
    future point


Yeah. When we originally setup Bugzappers, we had quite a few members actively triaging, creating scripts and so on for a while and I believe it did improve the overall quality of the project and provided a way for people to do some drive by contributions. We might want to revive this effort again at some point. Matej Cepl and others had some scripts, browser extensions etc to help out.

This is fun yes let's talk about the "bugzapper" name go ahead make my day!

JBG
-- 
test mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Reply via email to