On Jul 12, 2013 4:15 PM, "Michael Schwendt" <mschwe...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, 12 Jul 2013 12:35:32 -0400 (EDT), Joerg Lechner wrote: > > > Hi > > in that file, that Adobe classifies as "Yum" there seems Adobe presents an older Flash Plugin version. The version classified by Adobe as "rpm" is -as I have seen- the newest and with Firefox working version. > > Kind Regards and thanks for advice and help > > Why didn't you quote any version numbers or show command-line queries? > What version difference have you noticed where? Details, please. > > > http://get.adobe.com/flashplayer/ > > | YUM for Linux (YUM) > | > | Adobe Flash Player version 11.2.202.297 > | Your system: Linux 64-bit, Firefox | 4.3 KB > > | .rpm for other Linux > | > | Adobe Flash Player version 11.2.202.297 > | Your system: Linux 64-bit, Firefox | 6.88 MB > > $ rpm -q flash-plugin > flash-plugin-11.2.202.297-release.x86_64 > > $ yum list flash-plugin > Loaded plugins: langpacks, refresh-packagekit > Installed Packages > flash-plugin.x86_64 11.2.202.297-release @adobe-linux-x86_64 > > -- > Fedora release 19 (Schrödinger’s Cat) - Linux 3.9.9-301.fc19.x86_64 > loadavg: 0.05 0.03 0.05 > -- > test mailing list > test@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
I am yum installing the release.x86_64 package rather than the yum package. Will there any problem with this?
-- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test