On Dec 16, 2013, at 3:06 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" <johan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On mán 16.des 2013 21:45, Mike Ruckman wrote: >> For those of us who haven't been with QA for even a year yet, can you >> give a brief "too long; didn't read" synopsis of your reasoning and >> where it stems from? Without some form of background it's hard to infer >> what your reasoning is. > > You can look at the archive why we initially dropped the QA group and the > reasoning why we should not revive the QA group is related to the future and > I ain't talking about the future WG's "providing" us with but an actual > future and direction for the project be heading into. > > Adam is right about what's wrong but as so often he's trying to fix it in the > wrong place… Seems to me it'll either be sorta useful, or it'll be completely utterly useless yet still benign. *shrug* Chris Murphy -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
