On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 11:33 PM, Matthew Miller <mat...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 04:52:05PM +0200, Kamil Paral wrote: > > Why would we dictate that Editions/Spins can't use different software on > > different architectures? It might make perfect sense to use browser X on > > x86_64 because it's very good, but use browser Y on i386 because of > memory > > limitations of i386 arch (browser Y needing much less memory than browser > > X). Similarly, if shell A no longer supports i386, why would be ban it > from > > Speaking as someone who "sells" this stuff, I think it'd be confusing > for the Editions to offer different software (except where dictated by > enabling the hardware). It'd be better to just say that we don't offer > the Edition and instead suggest various spins for architectures where > this comes up. Or, where we decide it's important enough, to make sure > we use software that works across all relevant archs (or if possible to > fix it when it doesn't work). > > And that's a completely valid approach if we choose to do it like this. I just feel we shouldn't be deciding this in the test list. It's a higher level policy than what we usually discuss regarding blocker criteria.
_______________________________________________ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
