On Fri, Mar 17, 2023 at 1:59 PM Ben Cotton <bcot...@redhat.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Mar 17, 2023 at 5:48 AM Kamil Paral <kpa...@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > The desktop environment must work correctly when displaying common
> application content - that includes regular application windows, video
> output, games and possibly other common content. Regular operations like
> windows close/resize/maximize/minimize/fullscreen (when
> supported/applicable), windows switching, using windows on virtual
> workspaces, and similar common operations must behave as expected.
>
> Thinking like an editor for a moment, this feels a little redundant in
> places. I agree with the general concept, so this is entirely a
> presentation issue and I will not push back if you disagree. :But how
> about something more like:
>
> The desktop environment must perform regular operations like windows
> close/resize/maximize/minimize/fullscreen (when supported/applicable),
> windows switching, using windows on virtual workspaces, and similar
> common operations as expected. Common application content such as
> regular application windows, video output, and games must be displayed
> correctly.
>

Thanks, sounds better. I'll propose an updated version with a few more
tweaks mentioned yesterday in the QA meeting.


>
> > Footnote - "What does this cover?":
> > A small number of misbehaving applications is not a violation of this
> criterion. The goal of this criterion is to ensure general functionality
> for different types of applications and their operations. An example of a
> violation would be e.g. if a significant number of QT applications couldn't
> be resized (but they should be), or if all Java applications failed to
> display any content.
>
> I'd also add something that makes it clear if it's the application not
> displaying the content correctly, that's out of scope for this
> criterion. I can't think of a good way to phrase that. But I wouldn't
> want someone to think Joe's Fancy Pew Pew Pew Game having a glitchy
> display would violate this.
>

Good idea, I'll try to include it.
_______________________________________________
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to