Hi, I think the version of NICDRV 0226 is v1.8, it cannot run well on 
OpenSolaris0811. We fixed some bugs in V1.9 about OpenSolaris, Please 
try the latest version from
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/device_drivers/auto_nicdrv.0330.tar.bz2

Thanks,
Robin

Tom Chen :
> Hello,
>
> I have tried several times installing NICDrv 0226 on two x86 servers running 
> OpenSolaris nv112, all failed. The symptom is same, all failed in nfs service 
> enabling on the test client. 
>
> For some reason, enabling nfs services keeps failing.
>
> # svcs -a| grep -i nfs
> disabled       11:33:39 svc:/network/nfs/cbd:default
> disabled       11:33:39 svc:/network/nfs/mapid:default
> disabled       11:33:55 svc:/network/nfs/rquota:default
> disabled       15:34:38 svc:/network/nfs/server:default
> online         14:51:00 svc:/network/nfs/status:default
> online         14:51:00 svc:/network/nfs/nlockmgr:default
> online         14:51:00 svc:/network/nfs/client:default
>
> Can someone tell us how to install successfully? or,  is there any new 
> release can fix this issue?
>
> Tom
>
> "Running root configure: configure ...
> 192.168.43.53 is alive
> 192.168.43.63 is alive
> The client is alive!
> svcadm: svc:/milestone/network depends on svc:/network/physical, which has 
> multiple instances.
> svcadm: svc:/milestone/network depends on svc:/network/physical, which has 
> multiple instances.
> svcadm: Instance "svc:/network/nfs/server:default" has been disabled by 
> another entity.
> Exec Failed: rsh 192.168.43.53 "svcadm enable -r -s 
> svc:/network/nfs/server:default > /dev/null; echo $?"
>
> remote 192.168.43.53 svc:/network/nfs/server:default
> Result: FAIL
>
>
>
> SUMMARY:
> Configuration failures occurred in the following directories:
>
>
>         ./
>
> Tests in these directories won't run until the failures are corrected
> stf_configure Failed : result = 0
> You have new mail in /var/mail/root"
>   

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/testing-discuss/attachments/20090422/7706f335/attachment.html>

Reply via email to