(Joe, please feel free to trump me on this - I'll keep plugging on this unless somebody tells me otherwise.)
Greg, by Monday at 11 I can get you and the testing list a breakdown of the bugs in report 28 sorted by the following: 1) Verified as closed - celebrate! 2) Verified as not-closed (reopened), add to release notes 3) We have no idea (probably treat the same as #2) - I hope this list will be empty. Plan for producing that email: (please revise/suggest as needed, partial strawman) * I've been writing test cases and procedures in the last few days for everything in report 33; I'll expand that to include the tickets in 28, which is a superset of 33. * You'll see me back at 1cc this afternoon installing 765 on the 20 XOs we got from Richard. I'm going to use those as the in-1cc 8.2.0 blockers test pool since our other testbeds are being used for connectivity tests (I think- Joe?) that require all 30 XOs running full-tilt on that. * This weekend: running tests. And running tests. And running tests. And - this is why I've spent so long on how-to-test tutorials and test cases - getting the visiting volunteers (+whoever I can pull in over IRC) on Saturday (MassXO comes in Sat. morning) and Sunday (support-gang) to run tests. I've been trying to build our capacity to run a lot of tests in parallel, and the bottleneck (imo) was people with XOs who were able to, with the given instructions, run all these tests. I hope I've fixed the "with the given instructions" part. You'll see this when I revise the [[Testing]] page later tonight. * Monday morning: Sit down and write up those 3 lists for Greg. How does this sound? -Mel Greg Smith wrote: > Hi Mel, Joe and team, > > I am writing the 8.2 release notes and I see a number of bugs which > are marked Test In Release, Test in Build or QA Signoff. > > If they really are fixed then I don't need to document them. However, > if they fail final test then I should document them. > > I believe the relevant list is at: > http://dev.laptop.org/report/28 > > Can you give me an ETA when you think you can have all of those > verified or sent back for more work? > > For now I will assume that they are fixed and I will not document > them. If you find one that is not fixed, please cc me on the bug or > let me know and I will add it to the release notes later. > > Thanks, > > Greg S > _______________________________________________ Testing mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/testing
